Archives

  • Zero Trust Reality Check: Questions to Assess Data and AI Defensibility

    Zero Trust Reality Check: Questions to Assess Data and AI Defensibility

    Daniel Linstedt

    This article helps executives evaluate the credibility of Zero Trust claims in data and AI environments. It highlights how confidence often exceeds the available proof, exposing gaps in enforcement and accountability. The diagnostic questions focus on contemporaneous evidence, ownership clarity, and semantic consistency. These issues reflect predictable outcomes of scaling complex controls without explicit governance.…

    Read More >>

  • Why Scaling AI Without a System of Information Management Increases Risk Instead of Intelligence

    Why Scaling AI Without a System of Information Management Increases Risk Instead of Intelligence

    Daniel Linstedt

    AI maturity depends on more than model sophistication or data volume; it requires a system that governs meaning, lineage, and accountability. Without such a system, AI amplifies existing information weaknesses, scaling ambiguity and operational risk. Failures attributed to AI models are often symptoms of missing information defensibility. Existing analytics success can conceal these structural vulnerabilities…

    Read More >>

  • Why AI Does Not Eliminate the Need for Data Modeling

    Why AI Does Not Eliminate the Need for Data Modeling

    Daniel Linstedt

    AI initiatives often fail to scale safely without disciplined information management that preserves meaning, lineage, and accountability. This failure is systemic, reflecting deferred decisions and fragmented authority rather than AI technology limitations. Data Vault should be understood as a system of information management that stabilizes semantic consistency across organizational change. Skepticism about data modeling arises…

    Read More >>

  • What Is a System of Information Management and Why Governance Alone Cannot Provide Defensibility at Scale

    What Is a System of Information Management and Why Governance Alone Cannot Provide Defensibility at Scale

    Daniel Linstedt

    A System of Information Management (SIM) is an enterprise capability that integrates people, processes, and technology to preserve data meaning, lineage, and accountability over time. Governance frameworks alone express intent but lack the operational mechanisms to provide auditable evidence and sustain defensibility at scale. As organizations grow and adopt AI-driven analytics, risks of definition drift…

    Read More >>

  • Modernization That Appears Successful Until Scrutiny

    Modernization That Appears Successful Until Scrutiny

    Daniel Linstedt

    Modernization efforts often appear successful based on delivery metrics but conceal growing liabilities due to lack of auditable evidence and clear accountability. Scaling and AI amplify these risks by increasing the impact of semantic drift and data integrity issues. Defensibility under audit requires explicit proof obligations and ownership, which are frequently deferred, creating governance gaps.…

    Read More >>

  • From Data Platforms to Information Systems: The Shift Analytics Has Yet to Make

    From Data Platforms to Information Systems: The Shift Analytics Has Yet to Make

    Daniel Linstedt

    This article examines the systemic authority fracture hindering the evolution from data platforms to integrated information systems in enterprise analytics. It highlights how misaligned decision rights and accountability create persistent fragmentation, deferred decisions, and operational friction. The analysis includes observable patterns that reveal this failure mode and a realistic scenario illustrating its impact on funding…

    Read More >>

  • Why Modern Analytics Fails to Scale Sustainably

    Why Modern Analytics Fails to Scale Sustainably

    Daniel Linstedt

    Modern analytics initiatives often fail to scale due to a systemic fracture between decision rights and accountability. This misalignment leads to fragmented ownership, repeated rework, and deferred decisions that undermine sustainable growth. The core issue lies in governance and operating model design rather than technology alone. Understanding this fracture clarifies why technology upgrades alone cannot…

    Read More >>

  • Distinguishing Data Vault Modeling from System Mastery

    Distinguishing Data Vault Modeling from System Mastery

    Daniel Linstedt

    This article examines the critical distinction between mastering Data Vault modeling techniques and achieving comprehensive system mastery within enterprises. It identifies an authority fracture where decision rights and accountability are misaligned, undermining governance and operational control. The discussion highlights recurring patterns that reveal systemic failure, including fragmented funding and inconsistent enforcement. Through scenario analysis and…

    Read More >>

  • AI in Analytics – Reshaping Insight

    AI in Analytics – Reshaping Insight

    Daniel Linstedt

    AI in Analytics: How Intelligence Is Reshaping Architecture, Data Flow, and the Future of Insight There’s a quiet shift happening in enterprises everywhere—a shift that feels less like a trend and more like a turning point. At first glance, it looks like “AI for analytics,” but once you look beneath the surface, you see something

    Read More >>

  • Unlocking Flexibility: Mastering Scalable Data Modeling

    Unlocking Flexibility: Mastering Scalable Data Modeling

    Daniel Linstedt

    Embracing Many-to-Many Relationships in Data Modeling: A Technical Guide PREFACE: there is another false belief out there: Many-to-many (links, pits, bridges) are bad and lead to join hell, and should never be used.  WRONG…. want to know why?  read on.  Note: anyone who claims “LINKS ARE BAD” or “MANY-TO-MANY should never be used” needs to

    Read More >>

Browse Categories

The Latest News—Unlocked and Straight to Your Inbox.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe to get the latest blogs, podcasts and notifications.